Crypto
Telegram CEO Durov Warns EU Age-Verification App Could Enable Broader Tracking
Telegram CEO Pavel Durov has raised concerns about the European Union’s new age-verification app, warning it could evolve into a wider system for online identity tracking.
His comments come just days after the European Commission announced the app is technically ready for rollout.
Security Concerns Raised by Researchers
In a post on Telegram, Durov pointed to analysis from security consultant Paul Moore, who claimed the app could be bypassed in under two minutes.
According to Moore, flaws in the system’s design may allow users to trick the verification process, meaning age checks might not be reliably tied to the actual user or their device.
He warned that such vulnerabilities could lead to a major data breach in the future.
Fears of Expanding Digital Surveillance
Durov argued that the risks go beyond technical flaws.
He suggested that the app could become a foundation for broader identity verification systems across online platforms in Europe. Over time, this could lead to increased tracking of users under the guise of safety and compliance.
The debate reflects growing global tensions around digital identity systems, as regulators push for stricter controls while critics warn about privacy risks.
EU Says System Is Privacy-Focused
The European Commission has positioned the app as a privacy-preserving solution.
First introduced in July 2025, the system is designed to allow users to prove they are over 18 without revealing additional personal information. It is built as an open-source framework and is intended to integrate with future European Digital Identity Wallets.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the app as “completely anonymous,” stating that users can verify their age without being tracked.
Questions Remain Over Real-World Security
Despite these assurances, the recent claims about vulnerabilities have raised doubts about whether the system can deliver on its privacy promises once deployed at scale.
Durov went further, calling the app “hackable by design” and warning that any initial weaknesses could later be used to justify stricter identity controls.
Ongoing Debate Around Digital Identity
The controversy highlights a broader issue facing governments and tech platforms worldwide.
As age verification and online safety measures become more common, balancing security, privacy, and user freedom remains a key challenge.
Durov, a long-time advocate for digital privacy and free speech, has been vocal in opposing systems he يرى as potentially enabling surveillance, even as governments argue they are necessary for user protection.
Crypto
Ethereum NFT Platform Foundation Shuts Down After Failed Blackdove Sale
Foundation, once one of the most prominent Ethereum-based NFT marketplaces from the 2021 boom, is officially shutting down after a planned acquisition fell through.
Founder and CEO Kayvon Tehranian announced the closure on Wednesday, confirming that the deal intended to keep the platform running under new ownership is no longer viable.
Failed Sale Forces Shutdown
While Tehranian did not explicitly name the buyer, the failed deal is tied to digital art platform Blackdove, which had previously planned to acquire Foundation.
The goal of the acquisition was to ensure continuity for the marketplace, but with the agreement collapsing, Foundation said it is no longer in a position to continue operations.
The platform will briefly come back online to allow users to delist their NFTs before shutting down permanently.
A Major Player From the NFT Boom
Launched in early 2021, Foundation quickly became a key platform during the NFT boom, facilitating high-value digital art sales at a time when the market was rapidly expanding.
According to Blackdove, the platform generated over $230 million in primary sales and hosted works from well-known artists such as Jen Stark, James Jean, and Reuben Wu.
It also gained attention for hosting Edward Snowden’s NFT “Stay Free,” which sold for around 2,200 Ether, valued at roughly $5 million at the time.
Declining NFT Market Takes Its Toll
Foundation’s closure reflects the broader downturn in the NFT market since its peak in 2022.
As trading volumes and liquidity declined, many independent platforms have struggled to sustain operations, leading to consolidation across the sector.
Wave of NFT Platform Shutdowns
Foundation is not alone. Several NFT marketplaces have either shut down or pivoted away from the space in recent months.
Platforms such as Nifty Gateway, Rodeo, and MakersPlace have all ceased operations or shifted focus, while X2Y2 and Bybit have scaled back or exited their NFT offerings.
Even infrastructure projects like Mint Blockchain have announced closures, signaling a broader contraction in the NFT ecosystem.
Market Consolidation Continues
Despite the downturn, OpenSea remains the dominant NFT marketplace, accounting for more than 70% of trading activity.
Competition still exists from platforms like Blur, but overall market activity has fallen back to levels seen before the 2021 surge.
Outlook for NFTs Remains Uncertain
While the current environment remains challenging, some industry leaders believe NFTs could see a resurgence in the future.
For now, however, Foundation’s shutdown highlights the reality of a maturing market where only a handful of platforms are able to survive reduced demand and tighter liquidity conditions.
Crypto
Circle Faces Lawsuit Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack
Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, is facing a class action lawsuit over its alleged role in the $280 million exploit of Drift Protocol earlier this month.
The lawsuit, filed in a Massachusetts district court, claims Circle failed to act in time to freeze stolen funds, allowing attackers to move hundreds of millions across blockchains.
Allegations of Negligence and Inaction
The case was brought by Drift investor Joshua McCollum on behalf of more than 100 affected users.
According to the complaint, attackers were able to transfer roughly $230 million in USDC from Solana to Ethereum using Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol over several hours without intervention.
The lawsuit accuses Circle of negligence and aiding unlawful conversion, arguing that timely action could have significantly reduced the losses.
“Circle permitted this criminal use of its technology,” the plaintiffs claim, stating that earlier intervention might have prevented much of the damage.
Questions Over Control and Responsibility
The case highlights a broader issue in the crypto industry: the extent to which companies should intervene when they have the technical ability to freeze funds.
While some firms can block or freeze assets, they often point to regulatory constraints or the absence of legal orders as reasons for not acting immediately.
Plaintiffs argue that Circle had the capability to intervene, noting that the company froze multiple USDC wallets in a separate legal case shortly before the Drift exploit.
Funds Laundered Through Ethereum and Privacy Tools
Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic suggested that the attack may be linked to North Korean state-backed hackers.
The stolen funds were reportedly converted into Ether and routed through the Tornado Cash privacy protocol in an attempt to obscure their origin.
The attackers carried out more than 100 transactions during US business hours, using Circle’s bridging infrastructure to move funds quickly across networks.
A “No-Win” Situation for Circle
Not everyone agrees that Circle should have acted differently.
Lorenzo Valente, director of research for digital assets at ARK Invest, argued that freezing funds without a clear legal mandate could create long-term risks.
He noted that such decisions could set precedents where companies are forced to make subjective calls about which transactions to block.
“Every future freeze becomes a judgment call,” Valente said, raising concerns about consistency and potential overreach.
Legal Outcome Could Set Industry Precedent
The lawsuit could have significant implications for how crypto firms handle security incidents and user funds.
As regulators and courts continue to define the responsibilities of centralized players in decentralized systems, the outcome may shape future expectations around intervention, accountability, and user protection.
For now, the case underscores the growing tension between decentralization principles and the realities of managing large-scale financial platforms.
Crypto
Key Ethereum Researcher Josh Stark Leaves Ethereum Foundation
Josh Stark, a prominent researcher and project manager at the Ethereum Foundation, has announced his departure after five years with the organization.
Stark shared the news on Thursday, saying he plans to take time off and has no immediate plans for his next move.
Stark Steps Away After Five Years
In a post, Stark reflected on Ethereum’s journey, highlighting how the ecosystem has consistently overcome skepticism and technical challenges.
He pointed to milestones such as the launch of Ethereum, the rise of decentralized finance, and the successful transition to Proof of Stake as achievements that many once thought impossible.
Stark did not provide a specific reason for his departure, stating only that he intends to focus on personal time with family and friends.
High-Profile Exit Amid Ongoing Changes
Stark’s exit marks one of the most significant departures from the Ethereum Foundation since its leadership shakeup in early 2025.
He was one of just four individuals listed under “Management” in the Foundation’s organizational structure, making his role particularly influential within the ecosystem.
His departure follows another recent exit, with contributor Trent Van Epps also stepping down from the organization.
Ethereum Foundation’s 2025 Restructuring
The Ethereum Foundation underwent major changes in 2025 after co-founder Vitalik Buterin outlined a new direction for the organization.
The restructuring aimed to bring in fresh talent, increase decentralization, and focus on improving network performance, including faster transaction speeds and scalability.
At the time, Buterin emphasized that the Foundation would not engage in political lobbying or represent specific vested interests, reinforcing its neutral role within the ecosystem.
Leadership Changes Continue
As part of the 2025 overhaul, the Foundation appointed Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Stańczak as co-directors.
However, Stańczak stepped down from his role in February 2026, leaving Wang as a continuing member of the management board.
Stark’s departure adds to the ongoing leadership transitions, raising questions about how the Foundation’s structure and priorities may continue to evolve.
Ethereum Ecosystem Moves Forward
Despite the changes, the Ethereum ecosystem continues to develop, with ongoing work around scalability, decentralized applications, and financial infrastructure.
Stark’s exit reflects a broader period of transition within the Foundation, as it adapts to new challenges and opportunities in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.
-
Crypto4 years agoCardalonia Aiming To Become The Biggest Metaverse Project On Cardano
-
Press Release5 years agoP2P2C BREAKTHROUGH CREATES A CONNECTION BETWEEN ETM TOKEN AND THE SUPER PROFITABLE MARKET
-
Blockchain6 years agoWOM Protocol partners with CoinPayments, the world’s largest cryptocurrency payments processor
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Press Release5 years agoProject Quantum – Decentralised AAA Gaming
-
Blockchain6 years agoWOM Protocol Recommended by Premier Crypto Analyst as only full featured project for August
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Blockchain6 years ago1.5 Times More Bitcoin is purchased by Grayscale Than Daily Mined Coins
