Blockchain
Esports and Virtual Sports: How Are They Different?
With the COVID-19 pandemic, many traditional sports bettors have started to look for other alternatives, namely esports and virtual sports.
To novices, esports and virtual sports might seem like the same thing, but there are many different features that set these two apart. We will be explaining what particularities esports and virtual sports have in order to help bettors decide which type of sports is more suited for their betting style.
What Are Esports?
Esports define the concept of gaming seen as a sport, where professional video game players compete in tournaments for prizes. Such competitions are basically a video game in which real players fight with each other.
While there are several video games that have traditional sports, such as football (FIFA), the most popular genres are multiplayer online battle arenas (MOBA), such as DOTA II, and first-person shooter games like Fortnite, Call of Duty, and Counter-Strike.
Betting on Esports involves betting on a team or individual player, either during the tournament, league, or match. Like traditional sports, you can place bets while the game is live, and you can also watch the live streams of big events, just like football.
Since the pandemic caused many traditional sports games to be canceled, many have shifted their interest towards esports, as these types of matches can be carried out exclusively online.
What Are Virtual Sports?
Virtual sports are virtual simulations of real-world, popular sports and do not involve any real action, as the outcomes are generated by computer-based sequences through the use of a Random Number Generator (RNG) software.
There are plenty of virtual sports based on “normal” sports betting, but the most popular seem to be horse racing and football. As these games use RNGs, betting on them is more similar to playing at an online casino than on a sportsbook. Instead of betting on the spin of a slot, you bet on a horse, a football team, or a racing car. Esports betting is more similar to real-sports betting, as the principle is largely the same.
The RNG software determines which player or team will win based on their odds, and their chance of winning in proportion to the odds is identical.
Virtual sports have been around for a long time, but because of the limited number of traditional sporting events, this type of betting has seen a resurgence, as bettors were seeking sports options during the pandemic.
Pros and Cons of Esports vs Virtual Sports
Both types of sports have their pros and cons when it comes to betting:
- Esports are more entertaining for video game fans, so you can understand the odds for such matches better;
- Virtual sports are easier to understand by traditional sports fans;
- When it comes to betting, Esports betting has the same mechanism that is applied to traditional sports betting, as you wager on the outcome of real-life events, even though they are happening online;
- Virtual sports betting is more like casino gambling, as the outcomes are generated at random, like with slots;
- You can bet on virtual sports whenever you want, as they are streamed non-stop;
- Esports events are played frequently, but not like virtual sports.
Whether you are into virtual sports betting or esports betting, the 1xBit online crypto sportsbook offers plenty of events for both. Here you can find games such as DOTA II, StarCraft, Overwatch, Rainbow 6, PUBG, Fortnite, and CS:GO, as well as virtual versions of football, racing, tennis, cockfights, and many others.
1xBit features a wide line on all bets, having a variety of bids for sports events, with over 20 betting variations per event, including Double Chance, Handicap, Correct Score, and many more. At 1xBit, you can find the best odds in the crypto sportsbook industry.
Registering on the platform is simple and requires only one click. No email or personal information has to be submitted, as the site automatically generates an account number and password. This, combined with the exclusive use of cryptocurrencies as payment, make 1xBit a fully anonymous sportsbook.
Users can fund their multi-currency accounts as soon as they create it, and they can start placing bets on their favorite esport or virtual sport without any worries.
1xBit supports the deposit and withdrawal of over 20 different cryptos, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. Payouts are executed quickly, and there are no transaction fees on 1xBit’s part, as all transactions are based on crypto.
New users can take advantage of a welcome bonus of 7 BTC that is given throughout the course of their first four deposits, where they can claim between 1 and 3 BTC for each deposit.
Come and discover esports and virtual betting on 1xBit and enrich your crypto funds!
Blockchain
TT Chain Positions Itself as an RWA-Focused Blockchain Targeting Enterprise Supply-Chain Adoption
TT Chain (TT) is emerging as a blockchain project focused on real-world asset infrastructure, supply-chain traceability, and enterprise-grade transparency solutions. The network’s design centers on enabling organizations to verify product origins, monitor logistics, and ensure compliance using immutable on-chain data — a positioning that aligns with the growing institutional appetite for blockchain-based audit systems.
Enterprise-Focused Architecture
TT Chain promotes itself as a purpose-built ledger for supply-chain activity. Its framework allows manufacturers, logistics operators, and retailers to record each stage of a product’s lifecycle on-chain, from raw material sourcing to final delivery. This structure is intended to reduce fraud, strengthen authentication processes, and build trust between stakeholders across complex value chains.
Several early use cases highlight the platform’s potential applications, including agricultural tracing, sustainable product verification, and industrial logistics coordination. These examples illustrate TT Chain’s attempt to bridge blockchain technology with day-to-day operational requirements inside physical industries.
Token Model and Supply Structure
The TT token functions as the native asset for the network. Public supply data indicates a capped supply of 210 million TT, with a significantly smaller portion currently identified as the active supply. Circulating supply remains unreported, suggesting that liquidity is constrained or subject to controlled release schedules.
Such supply conditions may influence market behavior, particularly during early ecosystem development, when token distribution and unlock pacing play a large role in user participation and exchange liquidity.
Market Positioning and Recent Performance
TT trades in a niche segment of the market, with price activity showing low-volume movements reflective of early-stage liquidity. Despite modest trading activity, the project continues to gain visibility due to its distinct enterprise-first focus — a narrative increasingly resonant in sectors exploring real-world asset tokenization.
RWA Momentum and Competitive Landscape
The broader blockchain industry is seeing accelerated interest in real-world asset systems, especially in logistics, sustainability, and compliance-oriented workflows. TT Chain aims to position itself within this rising category by offering a structured environment for data integrity and provenance tracking.
Its success will depend on measurable enterprise adoption, clarity around tokenomics, and the network’s ability to scale with business-grade performance needs.
Outlook
With a clearly defined target audience and a roadmap centered on real-world integration, TT Chain is working to differentiate itself from generalized L1 ecosystems. Whether it secures meaningful traction will be determined by its technological delivery, enterprise partnerships, and transparency around token circulation.
Blockchain
Zcash Proposes Dynamic Fee Model to Protect Users Amid Rising Network Costs
Zcash developers have introduced a new proposal to overhaul the network’s fee structure, aiming to address rising costs and prevent users from being priced out during periods of high demand. The announcement, which mirrors the principles behind Ethereum’s EIP-1559 upgrade, sparked immediate market interest—sending ZEC up by roughly 12% within hours.
A Dynamic Fee Model Focused on User Protection
The proposal, introduced by core contributors from the Electric Coin Company (ECC) and the Zcash Foundation (ZF), outlines a dynamic mechanism that adjusts fees in response to network congestion. By linking fees to real-time demand, Zcash aims to reduce the impact of speculative usage and sudden spikes that can erode network accessibility.
The model may also include a fee-burn component, similar to Ethereum’s EIP-1559, which permanently destroys a portion of fees. This approach not only helps counteract volatile fee environments but may also contribute to greater long-term economic sustainability.
Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Zcash Founder and former ECC CEO, emphasized the motivation behind the proposal, stating:
“Dynamic fees are designed to prevent users from being priced out of the network while ensuring sustainable miner economics.”
Market Response and Broader Implications
Following the announcement, ZEC saw a sharp price increase as traders responded to the potential of a more efficient fee system. The proposal arrives at a time when Zcash has become one of the highest fee-generating networks in the broader cryptocurrency landscape, an indicator of both demand and the need for structural reform.
If implemented, the dynamic fee model may enhance miner revenue consistency while improving user affordability—two critical components for long-term ecosystem health. The upgrade could also reinforce Zcash’s positioning among privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, especially as institutions increasingly explore regulated exposure through vehicles such as the Grayscale Zcash Trust.
While the proposal is still under discussion, ECC and ZF highlighted that any change must balance sustainability for miners with usability for everyday participants. As stablecoin and privacy-preserving tools gain traction globally, optimized fee structures could determine which networks remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market.
Blockchain
Giggle Fund AI (GIGGLE) Debuts as BNB-Chain Meme Token With Charity-Minded Mechanics
A new BNB-chain token, Giggle Fund AI (GIGGLE), has entered the memecoin scene with a blend of playful branding and a stated charitable vision. The project aims to combine meme-style appeal with a community-driven funding model, positioning itself as a fun but socially conscious entry among recent token launches.
Token Basics & Supply Structure
GIGGLE operates on the BNB (BEP-20) chain and comes with a fixed maximum supply of 21 million tokens — a relatively modest cap compared with many newer meme tokens. The tokenomics include an 8% tax applied to both buys and sells, designed to support liquidity, project marketing, and community growth. These characteristics align GIGGLE with early-stage tokens that attempt to balance hype with a basic sustainability mechanism.
Narrative: Memes, AI Theme & Community Focus
Embracing a playful, tech-inflected vibe, Giggle Fund AI wraps its branding around a lighthearted, AI-themed meme aesthetic. Rather than positioning itself purely as a speculative asset, the project promotes itself as a community and fun-driven token, aiming to stand out with a slightly different tone from high-volatility “pump-and-dump” style coins. This comedic, community-oriented positioning could attract investors looking for lower-stakes exposure with a dash of novelty.
Charity-Wing Ambitions
One of GIGGLE’s differentiators is a stated commitment to charitable causes. According to the project’s description, a portion of transaction fees is allocated to charitable or community-oriented funding initiatives. This gives GIGGLE a dual identity: part meme coin, part socially conscious experiment. For some investors, that added narrative may provide an emotional or ethical incentive beyond speculation.
Risks & What to Watch
As with many early-stage meme tokens, GIGGLE’s future is tied heavily to community interest, trading volume, and sustained engagement. The charitable mechanism and overall utility remain unproven — without transparent reporting, donations, or verifiable impact, the charity aspect may remain largely symbolic. Additionally, the tax on transactions reduces liquidity for frequent traders, which may deter active trading or speculative volume.
With a small supply but moderate tax structure, GIGGLE’s price could remain volatile — beneficial for risk-tolerant investors, but risky for those expecting stability. The project will heavily depend on community growth and transparency to avoid typical pitfalls seen in meme-coin cycles.
-
Crypto3 years agoCardalonia Aiming To Become The Biggest Metaverse Project On Cardano
-
Press Release5 years agoP2P2C BREAKTHROUGH CREATES A CONNECTION BETWEEN ETM TOKEN AND THE SUPER PROFITABLE MARKET
-
Blockchain5 years agoWOM Protocol partners with CoinPayments, the world’s largest cryptocurrency payments processor
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Press Release5 years agoProject Quantum – Decentralised AAA Gaming
-
Blockchain5 years agoWOM Protocol Recommended by Premier Crypto Analyst as only full featured project for August
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Blockchain6 years ago1.5 Times More Bitcoin is purchased by Grayscale Than Daily Mined Coins
