Connect with us

Blockchain

Monolythium Introduces Public Testnet After Full Protocol Reset

Published

on


Monolythium Foundation Introduces Public Testnet for Post-Quantum Rust/RISC-V Layer 1

Monolythium Foundation today introduced the public testnet for Monolythium, a rebuilt Layer 1 blockchain designed as settlement infrastructure for autonomous agents, post-quantum accounts, native markets, and operator-cluster infrastructure.

The launch follows a full protocol reset. On April 28, 2026, Monolythium decommissioned its predecessor Cosmos-based app-chain, including its earlier EVM-bridged surface, legacy test network, operator software, launchpad, and explorer. The project chose to rebuild the protocol around autonomous economic activity carried out by humans, companies, software agents, and online services on open settlement rails.

Monolythium’s position is that the next phase of blockchain infrastructure will not be defined only by wallets sending tokens. Software agents are beginning to request services, pay for APIs, buy compute, open escrow, negotiate terms, and act under delegated authority. That requires more than generic smart contracts. It requires identity, consent, spending policy, reputation, service discovery, native markets, and dispute resolution enforced below the application layer.

“Monolythium was not rebuilt to become a slightly faster version of an existing EVM chain,” said Nayiem Willems, founder of Monolythium. “The reset was about removing assumptions that would have limited the protocol later. If autonomous agents are going to hold identities, spend funds, pay service providers, open escrow, and build reputation across platforms, the settlement layer underneath them needs different primitives from day one.”

The rebuilt protocol is not EVM-compatible at execution. Existing Solidity contracts and EVM bytecode do not run natively on Monolythium. The execution layer is Rust-first and compiled to deterministic RISC-V artifacts, while common settlement functions are handled through native protocol modules instead of repeatedly redeployed application contracts.

Those native modules include asset standards, name registration, account policy, issuer attestations, service discovery, availability, reputation, escrow, bridge policy, spending limits, and a protocol-level spot central limit order book, or CLOB. The native CLOB is intended to provide shared spot-market infrastructure for token pairs, stablecoin pairs, compute, data, agent services, real-world assets, and other marketable resources without requiring every market to depend on a separate bespoke contract.

Monolythium deliberately excludes perpetual futures and margin trading from the base protocol. The market layer is designed around spot settlement rather than leveraged derivatives. The project’s view is that agents paying for services, buying compute, routing liquidity, or managing treasury balances need predictable markets and final settlement at the protocol layer.

Post-quantum cryptography is built into the protocol from the start. Monolythium uses ML-DSA-65 for account and consensus signatures. User accounts, operator identities, and consensus certificates are based on post-quantum signatures rather than classical elliptic-curve signatures. The reason is structural: if an account or autonomous agent accumulates reputation, consent history, commercial activity, and attestations over years, its key material becomes part of its economic identity. Monolythium is designed so that identity does not begin with a future migration problem.

At the consensus layer, Monolythium uses Starfish-C, a DAG-BFT design organized around vertices, waves, and anchors. Anchors serve as the user-facing finality unit for payments, orders, escrow updates, bridge routes, and agent actions.

Monolythium also uses operator clusters instead of treating a network operator as a single key controlled by one party. Operators join clusters, clusters admit operators, and infrastructure quality becomes visible through network tooling. The model is intended to make region, reliability, hardware profile, archive capability, oracle support, and other service tiers part of the operator market.

The public testnet also includes LythiumSeal, Monolythium’s encrypted mempool research track. LythiumSeal is designed to keep sealed transaction bodies opaque until ordering is locked, reducing the visibility that can enable front-running and transaction-order manipulation. It is live on testnet, open source, opt-in, and research-stage.

Monolythium mainnet has not launched. The current release is a public testnet intended for developers, operators, and researchers.

About Monolythium

Monolythium is a Rust/RISC-V-native Layer 1 blockchain designed as settlement infrastructure for the autonomous economy. The protocol combines post-quantum account and consensus signing, Starfish-C DAG-BFT consensus, native asset standards, a native spot CLOB, agent-commerce primitives, operator clusters, and hardened node infrastructure.

The Bitcoin Daily is one of the most reliable and leading portal about Technology News, Latest Updates, Financial News, Business and any all subjects related to technology and blockchain.

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Telcoin’s Digital Asset Bank Just Opened Real US Accounts Tied to Its Stablecoin

Published

on

Telcoin has done something no other crypto company has managed to do. After years of regulatory groundwork, the company has switched on real US bank accounts tied directly to an on-chain dollar stablecoin — and they’re open to US residents right now through version 5 of the Telcoin Wallet.

This isn’t a pilot program or a regulatory sandbox experiment. Telcoin Digital Asset Bank is a chartered depository institution, the first Digital Asset Depository Institution in the United States, operating under a full banking framework rather than the non-depository trust structures most of its peers have pursued.

How the Accounts Actually Work

The eUSD accounts link directly to Telcoin’s bank-issued on-chain stablecoin, backed by US dollar deposits and short-term Treasuries held in reserve. The integration means customer deposits directly back the on-chain tokens — a model that’s structurally different from how Tether or Circle operate, where stablecoin issuance and depository banking exist in separate legal entities with different regulatory treatment.

The result is what Telcoin describes as seamless movement of value between traditional banking infrastructure and blockchain rails under a single account. Users holding eUSD in Wallet V5 are holding a bank-issued stablecoin backed by their own deposits, not a token issued by a non-bank entity operating outside the traditional depository system.

That distinction carries real weight in the current regulatory environment. Federal regulators have repeatedly flagged systemic risk concerns around stablecoins issued outside the banking framework. Telcoin’s model addresses those concerns directly — not by lobbying for exceptions, but by operating within the full banking regulatory structure from day one.

The Regulatory Foundation That Made This Possible

The charter approval from the Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance didn’t happen quickly or accidentally. The groundwork was laid in 2021 when then-Nebraska state legislator Mike Flood — now a US Representative — introduced the Nebraska Financial Innovation Act. That legislation passed the same year and created the legal framework for Digital Asset Depository Institutions to exist in the United States.

Telcoin’s charter under that Act, combined with alignment to federal GENIUS Act guidelines, gives the company a unique position: the ability to issue stablecoins, accept customer deposits, and process eUSD payments all under a single charter. Most blockchain companies operating in the stablecoin space have to navigate multiple regulatory relationships to achieve the same outcome. Telcoin doesn’t.

The broader context matters here too. Bloomberg reported a 70% increase in stablecoin usage since July, driven in significant part by the passage of the GENIUS Act providing a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins. Telcoin’s bank-issued approach positions it as one of the few players that was already operating in compliance with that framework before it became a federal requirement rather than scrambling to adapt after the fact.

TEL Responds to the News

Markets didn’t need long to react. The TEL token jumped roughly 17% on the announcement and daily trading volume spiked more than 500% — a response that reflects how much investor appetite exists for projects with tangible, verifiable regulatory footing rather than regulatory aspirations.

The volume spike in particular is telling. A 500% surge in daily trading activity suggests the news reached well beyond the existing Telcoin holder base and pulled in traders who had been watching from the sidelines waiting for exactly this kind of concrete milestone.

For the stablecoin market more broadly, Telcoin’s launch introduces a genuinely new model — one where the issuer is also the bank, the deposits are real, and the regulatory framework is a full banking charter rather than a workaround. Whether that model attracts meaningful market share from Tether and Circle’s combined dominance is the longer-term question. The infrastructure to compete is now live.

Continue Reading

Blockchain

FYNOR Launches FYC Ecosystem Growth Support Program Ahead of Token Listing

Published

on

As part of the upcoming launch of the FYNOR platform token FYC, FYNOR is officially introducing the FYC Ecosystem Growth Support Program, designed to strengthen platform liquidity, expand ecosystem participation, and support sustainable community growth.

Program Period: June 22, 2026 – July 10, 2026

FYC Listing Date: July 15, 2026

Program Highlights

  1. Trading Support Allocation

During the campaign period, eligible users who allocate funds to their settlement accounts will receive an equivalent trading support allocation from the platform.

This additional allocation is intended to enhance strategy participation and improve ecosystem activity while maintaining users’ original capital ownership.

Upon completion of the campaign, the platform-provided support allocation will be automatically withdrawn, while users retain their original funds and any applicable trading results generated during the event period.

2. FYC Reward Distribution

Following the conclusion of the campaign, participants will receive FYC rewards based on their qualified participation amount.

The reward distribution will be completed after the official launch of FYC on July 15, 2026.

Ecosystem Development Initiative

The FYC Growth Support Program represents an important milestone in the development of the FYNOR ecosystem, focusing on:

• Expanding platform participation

• Enhancing ecosystem liquidity

• Supporting sustainable token growth

• Strengthening long-term community value

Important Notice

To ensure a stable operating environment and support the successful launch of FYC, settlement account assets participating in the program will remain within the strategy system during the campaign period.

Normal transfer functionality between settlement and spot accounts will resume after the campaign concludes on July 10, 2026.

FYNOR remains committed to building a transparent, technology-driven digital asset ecosystem where users can participate in the long-term growth of the platform.

#FYNOR #FYC #Crypto #Web3 #Blockchain #DigitalAssets #Trading #AITrading #TokenLaunch #EcosystemGrowth

Continue Reading

Blockchain

StakeStone (STO) Faces Supply Pressure and Trust Questions After Volatile April and a Major June Unlock

Published

on

StakeStone has had a turbulent few months, and the chart tells the story bluntly. STO hit an all-time high of $1.75 on April 2, 2026, before collapsing roughly 97% to trade around $0.05 at the time of writing. That kind of round-trip in under three months raises hard questions — not just about market conditions, but about what actually drove the move and who benefited from it.

The answers don’t fully flatter the project’s near-term outlook.

The April Pump and What On-Chain Data Showed

In early April, STO rocketed from $0.11 to nearly $1.87 — a gain of over 1,600% within two days — before sharply correcting. On-chain analysis revealed the pump was preceded by a whale withdrawing 25.5 million STO, representing 11.32% of supply, from Binance, tightening exchange liquidity. The same entity later deposited 28 million tokens to Gate.io, signaling a distribution phase.

Shortly after, blockchain analytics spotted the StakeStone team transferring 16 million STO tokens worth approximately $2.87 million from its official distribution contract to a Bitget deposit wallet. The combination of whale activity and team transfers landing on exchange in the aftermath of a parabolic move was enough to shake confidence among holders who bought into the rally.

On-chain data also shows market makers including Wintermute and Amber active in STO, suggesting concentrated holdings that amplify volatility in both directions.

The June 3 Unlock Added More Pressure

Just as the token was trying to find a floor, a significant supply event arrived. A major unlock of 20.17 million STO — representing 2.02% of total supply and 8.95% of circulating supply, valued at approximately $18.22 million — occurred on June 3, 2026. The unlock ranked among the top five by dilution percentage for that week across all of crypto, with a 9.48% circulating supply increase arriving at exactly the wrong time — immediately after a sharp price decline and during a period of damaged community sentiment.

STO is currently trading around $0.05 with a market cap of approximately $11.4 million and a fully diluted valuation of $50.6 million against a total supply of 1 billion tokens — a ratio that highlights just how much supply pressure remains ahead regardless of near-term price direction.

What StakeStone Actually Builds

The protocol itself has genuine infrastructure value that the recent volatility has overshadowed. StakeStone is an omnichain liquidity infrastructure protocol designed to solve liquidity fragmentation by letting users stake ETH and BTC to receive liquid tokens usable across 20+ chains. Its core products include STONE, a yield-bearing liquid ETH token, SBTC and STONEBTC for Bitcoin exposure, and LiquidityPad — a customizable vault system for protocols to direct incentives and attract specific liquidity flows.

The most significant fundamental catalyst in the project’s recent history is its partnership with World Liberty Finance. StakeStone serves as the primary minting and cross-chain distribution channel for WLFI’s USD1 stablecoin, which grew to a $2.1 billion issuance within 100 days of launch. The integration aims to natively distribute USD1 across 20+ blockchains and embed it in DeFi yield products. If that partnership scales, it could drive meaningful protocol usage that the current market cap doesn’t reflect.

The STO governance model uses a veSTO vote-escrowed system where holders lock tokens for voting power and protocol emissions control, alongside a Swap and Burn mechanism where a portion of STO used for ecosystem bribes is burned — creating deflationary pressure over time. A governance DAO launch is also on the roadmap, which would formalize this structure.

Technical indicators are currently net bearish, with 23 signals pointing negative against 7 bullish, and the RSI sitting around 30.80 — near oversold territory but not yet showing a confirmed reversal signal. For a token that’s lost 97% from its peak in under three months, rebuilding confidence will require more than a governance announcement. The USD1 partnership gives StakeStone a legitimate growth narrative — whether it’s enough to offset supply dynamics and shaken sentiment is the question the market is working through.

Continue Reading

Trending