Blockchain
Are DCG and Genesis going bankrupt and causing another crypto crash like Terra Luna?
- Sources familiar with the matter said that Genesis has hired an investment bank to explore different options, including bankruptcy.
- DCG chief Barry Silbert wrote to investors explaining the current situation and assured that they would come out stronger from the current crisis.
The contagion of the FTX collapse has spread to some of the biggest players in the crypto space such as the Digital Currency Group (DCG). On Tuesday, November 22, sources familiar with the matter told the New York Times that Genesis Global Capital has hired investment bank Moelis & Company to explore different options including bankruptcy.
The report adds that there aren’t any financial decisions made yet and that Genesis can still look to avoid bankruptcy. As per the previous reports, Genesis Global is looking to raise $1 billion in funds with a deadline of Wednesday. Another option proposed by industry experts is Reg M for Grayscale’s Trust.
In the FTX accounts, the derivatives unit of Genesis Global has more than $175 million locked. Thus, all eyes are now on the parent company Digital Currency Group (DCG), and whether it can help Genesis with its liquidity requirement. Some sources familiar with the matter also stated that Genesis has lowered the ask of fundraising to $500 million. In a note to investors on Tuesday, DCG founder and CEO Barry Silbert spoke about the current situation. He noted:
In recent days, there has been chatter about intercompany loans between Genesis Global Capital and DCG. For those unaware, in the ordinary course of business, DCG has borrowed money from Genesis Global Capital in the same vein as hundreds of crypto investment firms. These loans were always structured on an arm’s length basis and priced at prevailing market interest rates.
DCG will come out stronger from this Crypto winter
Barry Silbert further disclosed adding that DCG has a liability of $575 million to Genesis Global due May 2023. He added that DCG used this loan amount to fund different investment opportunities and repurchase the DCG stock from non-employee shareholders in the secondary market.
Furthermore, Silbert reminded investors that there’s a $1.1 billion promissory note due June 2023, that DCG owes Genesis related to the liabilities from the default of Three Arrows Capital. However, Silbert remains confident that DCG can come out stronger from the current mess. He noted:
DCG will continue to be a leading builder of the industry and we are committed to our long-term mission of accelerating the development of a better financial system. We have weathered previous crypto winters and while this one may feel more severe, collectively we will come out of it stronger.
Amid the current liquidity crunch and the mismatch in the loan book, Genesis Global leadership and their board decided to hire legal and financial advisors. The firm is exploring different possible options as of now. “Our goal is to resolve the current situation without the need for filing a bankruptcy,” a Genesis spokesman told the New York Times.
Der Beitrag Are DCG and Genesis going bankrupt and causing another crypto crash like Terra Luna? erschien zuerst auf Crypto News Flash.
Blockchain
TT Chain Positions Itself as an RWA-Focused Blockchain Targeting Enterprise Supply-Chain Adoption
TT Chain (TT) is emerging as a blockchain project focused on real-world asset infrastructure, supply-chain traceability, and enterprise-grade transparency solutions. The network’s design centers on enabling organizations to verify product origins, monitor logistics, and ensure compliance using immutable on-chain data — a positioning that aligns with the growing institutional appetite for blockchain-based audit systems.
Enterprise-Focused Architecture
TT Chain promotes itself as a purpose-built ledger for supply-chain activity. Its framework allows manufacturers, logistics operators, and retailers to record each stage of a product’s lifecycle on-chain, from raw material sourcing to final delivery. This structure is intended to reduce fraud, strengthen authentication processes, and build trust between stakeholders across complex value chains.
Several early use cases highlight the platform’s potential applications, including agricultural tracing, sustainable product verification, and industrial logistics coordination. These examples illustrate TT Chain’s attempt to bridge blockchain technology with day-to-day operational requirements inside physical industries.
Token Model and Supply Structure
The TT token functions as the native asset for the network. Public supply data indicates a capped supply of 210 million TT, with a significantly smaller portion currently identified as the active supply. Circulating supply remains unreported, suggesting that liquidity is constrained or subject to controlled release schedules.
Such supply conditions may influence market behavior, particularly during early ecosystem development, when token distribution and unlock pacing play a large role in user participation and exchange liquidity.
Market Positioning and Recent Performance
TT trades in a niche segment of the market, with price activity showing low-volume movements reflective of early-stage liquidity. Despite modest trading activity, the project continues to gain visibility due to its distinct enterprise-first focus — a narrative increasingly resonant in sectors exploring real-world asset tokenization.
RWA Momentum and Competitive Landscape
The broader blockchain industry is seeing accelerated interest in real-world asset systems, especially in logistics, sustainability, and compliance-oriented workflows. TT Chain aims to position itself within this rising category by offering a structured environment for data integrity and provenance tracking.
Its success will depend on measurable enterprise adoption, clarity around tokenomics, and the network’s ability to scale with business-grade performance needs.
Outlook
With a clearly defined target audience and a roadmap centered on real-world integration, TT Chain is working to differentiate itself from generalized L1 ecosystems. Whether it secures meaningful traction will be determined by its technological delivery, enterprise partnerships, and transparency around token circulation.
Blockchain
Zcash Proposes Dynamic Fee Model to Protect Users Amid Rising Network Costs
Zcash developers have introduced a new proposal to overhaul the network’s fee structure, aiming to address rising costs and prevent users from being priced out during periods of high demand. The announcement, which mirrors the principles behind Ethereum’s EIP-1559 upgrade, sparked immediate market interest—sending ZEC up by roughly 12% within hours.
A Dynamic Fee Model Focused on User Protection
The proposal, introduced by core contributors from the Electric Coin Company (ECC) and the Zcash Foundation (ZF), outlines a dynamic mechanism that adjusts fees in response to network congestion. By linking fees to real-time demand, Zcash aims to reduce the impact of speculative usage and sudden spikes that can erode network accessibility.
The model may also include a fee-burn component, similar to Ethereum’s EIP-1559, which permanently destroys a portion of fees. This approach not only helps counteract volatile fee environments but may also contribute to greater long-term economic sustainability.
Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Zcash Founder and former ECC CEO, emphasized the motivation behind the proposal, stating:
“Dynamic fees are designed to prevent users from being priced out of the network while ensuring sustainable miner economics.”
Market Response and Broader Implications
Following the announcement, ZEC saw a sharp price increase as traders responded to the potential of a more efficient fee system. The proposal arrives at a time when Zcash has become one of the highest fee-generating networks in the broader cryptocurrency landscape, an indicator of both demand and the need for structural reform.
If implemented, the dynamic fee model may enhance miner revenue consistency while improving user affordability—two critical components for long-term ecosystem health. The upgrade could also reinforce Zcash’s positioning among privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, especially as institutions increasingly explore regulated exposure through vehicles such as the Grayscale Zcash Trust.
While the proposal is still under discussion, ECC and ZF highlighted that any change must balance sustainability for miners with usability for everyday participants. As stablecoin and privacy-preserving tools gain traction globally, optimized fee structures could determine which networks remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market.
Blockchain
Giggle Fund AI (GIGGLE) Debuts as BNB-Chain Meme Token With Charity-Minded Mechanics
A new BNB-chain token, Giggle Fund AI (GIGGLE), has entered the memecoin scene with a blend of playful branding and a stated charitable vision. The project aims to combine meme-style appeal with a community-driven funding model, positioning itself as a fun but socially conscious entry among recent token launches.
Token Basics & Supply Structure
GIGGLE operates on the BNB (BEP-20) chain and comes with a fixed maximum supply of 21 million tokens — a relatively modest cap compared with many newer meme tokens. The tokenomics include an 8% tax applied to both buys and sells, designed to support liquidity, project marketing, and community growth. These characteristics align GIGGLE with early-stage tokens that attempt to balance hype with a basic sustainability mechanism.
Narrative: Memes, AI Theme & Community Focus
Embracing a playful, tech-inflected vibe, Giggle Fund AI wraps its branding around a lighthearted, AI-themed meme aesthetic. Rather than positioning itself purely as a speculative asset, the project promotes itself as a community and fun-driven token, aiming to stand out with a slightly different tone from high-volatility “pump-and-dump” style coins. This comedic, community-oriented positioning could attract investors looking for lower-stakes exposure with a dash of novelty.
Charity-Wing Ambitions
One of GIGGLE’s differentiators is a stated commitment to charitable causes. According to the project’s description, a portion of transaction fees is allocated to charitable or community-oriented funding initiatives. This gives GIGGLE a dual identity: part meme coin, part socially conscious experiment. For some investors, that added narrative may provide an emotional or ethical incentive beyond speculation.
Risks & What to Watch
As with many early-stage meme tokens, GIGGLE’s future is tied heavily to community interest, trading volume, and sustained engagement. The charitable mechanism and overall utility remain unproven — without transparent reporting, donations, or verifiable impact, the charity aspect may remain largely symbolic. Additionally, the tax on transactions reduces liquidity for frequent traders, which may deter active trading or speculative volume.
With a small supply but moderate tax structure, GIGGLE’s price could remain volatile — beneficial for risk-tolerant investors, but risky for those expecting stability. The project will heavily depend on community growth and transparency to avoid typical pitfalls seen in meme-coin cycles.
-
Crypto3 years agoCardalonia Aiming To Become The Biggest Metaverse Project On Cardano
-
Press Release5 years agoP2P2C BREAKTHROUGH CREATES A CONNECTION BETWEEN ETM TOKEN AND THE SUPER PROFITABLE MARKET
-
Blockchain5 years agoWOM Protocol partners with CoinPayments, the world’s largest cryptocurrency payments processor
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Press Release5 years agoProject Quantum – Decentralised AAA Gaming
-
Blockchain5 years agoWOM Protocol Recommended by Premier Crypto Analyst as only full featured project for August
-
Press Release5 years agoETHERSMART DEVELOPER’S VISION MADE FINTECH COMPANY BECOME DUBAI’S TOP DIGITAL BANK
-
Blockchain6 years ago1.5 Times More Bitcoin is purchased by Grayscale Than Daily Mined Coins
