Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a pioneering bill that establishes the first AI chatbot regulation in California, focusing on platforms that simulate friendship or intimacy. The legislation, known as Senate Bill 243 and introduced by State Senator Steve Padilla, was signed into law this Monday, marking a milestone in artificial intelligence oversight and the protection of vulnerable users, especially minors.

The new regulation requires developer companies of these chatbots to implement clear safeguards. The law mandates the explicit disclosure of the chatbot’s artificial identity, ensuring users know they are interacting with software and not a person. Furthermore, it specifically prohibits chatbots from engaging in conversations about sexual or self-harm topics with minors and establishes protocols for reporting detected cases of suicidal ideation to the state’s Office of Suicide Prevention.

This legislation is relevant because it shifts the focus of AI supervision. Instead of concentrating solely on model architecture or data bias, it directly addresses the emotional interaction between humans and machines. California becomes the first state to set clear boundaries for “companion” chatbots, setting a precedent that could influence future regulations nationwide. The measure seeks to balance innovation with protection, an increasingly present debate in the tech sector.

Real Protection or a Symbolic Gesture?

Despite its passage, the bill is not without controversy. Advocacy groups like Common Sense Media withdrew their support, arguing that the final version was “watered down” after industry lobbying. They label the law as a hollow gesture rather than meaningful policy, as key provisions like external audits were removed. For developers, implementation presents challenges, such as age verification and the risk of restricting legitimate mental health conversations out of caution.

The debate over this law’s actual impact is just beginning. While Governor Newsom defends it as a necessary guardrail, the industry and advocacy groups are closely watching its implementation. The success of this regulation will shape the future of AI governance, determining whether it is possible to create a safer digital environment without stifling the potential of these emerging technologies to offer support and connection.

The post California Passes Historic AI Chatbot Regulation to Protect Minors appeared first on The Cryptocurrency Post.

Grok, the artificial intelligence integrated into Elon Musk’s X platform, has identified five key strategies to optimize participation in the second season of Aster Airdrop Farming. With the October 5, 2025, deadline fast approaching, the AI’s analysis, based on real-time data and community discussions, offers a roadmap for users looking to maximize their “Rh” points and secure a share of the 4% of the total ASTER token supply.

Aster’s reward system is not based solely on trading volume, but on a combination of factors that Grok has broken down for efficiency. The analysis highlights that “taker” orders (which take liquidity) generate twice as many points as “maker” orders. Furthermore, the time positions are held open and the use of native assets like USDF or asBNB as margin are crucial, as both can double the points from weekly volume. The AI also emphasizes the importance of referrals and team participation to multiply earnings.

The 5 Key Strategies Revealed by the AI

Grok has synthesized its analysis into five operational tactics. The first is delta-neutral hedging, ideal for those who want to generate volume without price risk. The second focuses on high-frequency “taker” trades with short holding periods to maximize the 2x bonus. Third is the team and referral boost, a social strategy to amplify base points. The fourth tactic promotes the use of native assets, which not only increases points but can also offer additional yields. Finally, the AI suggests completing quests and holding spot tokens as a low-risk starting point.

This intervention by Grok marks a milestone at the intersection of artificial intelligence technology and crypto market analysis. Instead of relying on manual analysis, users now have access to strategies generated by a system that processes live market data, which could change how traders approach events like Aster Airdrop Farming. This event thus becomes a testing ground for the application of AI in decentralized finance.

However, Grok’s own analysis warns of the implications and dangers. Participants must consider the inherent risks, which include high transaction costs that could outweigh the value of the rewards, liquidation risk from leverage, and the possibility that the airdrop rules could change. The recommendation is clear: careful risk control is essential, and one should not invest more capital than they are willing to lose, as the final conversion rate from points to tokens is not yet defined.

As the deadline approaches, the strategies outlined by the AI offer a clear path for participants in Aster Airdrop Farming. Success is not guaranteed and will depend on disciplined execution and prudent risk management. This event will not only determine the distribution of ASTER tokens but could also set a precedent for how artificial intelligence will influence the future of trading and participation in the crypto ecosystem.

The post Elon Musk’s Grok AI Reveals the Five Ultimate Strategies for the Aster Airdrop appeared first on The Cryptocurrency Post.

A recent academic study warns that Ethereum’s scaling solutions, known as Ethereum Layer-2 rollups, are incorrectly pricing small transactions. The research, conducted by experts from zkSecurity, Prooflab, and Imperial College London, indicates that current fee models distort the actual cost, directly affecting users with lower-volume operations. This situation not only leads to overcharging but also opens new security vulnerabilities.

The report’s main finding details that a major issue is that current fee structures are overly simplistic. These models group various costs—such as execution, data availability, and cryptographic proofs—into a single formula or apply fixed rules. As a result, small transactions end up being overpriced, forcing users to pay more than they should. Conversely, other operations may be underpriced, creating an imbalance that can be exploited.

This pricing problem arises in a context where Ethereum Layer-2 rollups are fundamental to the network’s scalability. Their goal is to process transactions off the main chain to reduce costs and increase speed. However, the research shows that the method for recording this data on the mainnet does not adequately distinguish between transactions, applying fixed costs that harm smaller operations and benefit larger ones.

The implications of this flaw are twofold. For the market, it means that ordinary users making modest transfers or interacting with low-value decentralized applications are unknowingly subsidizing higher-volume operations. Furthermore, from a security standpoint, it creates an attack vector, as malicious actors could flood the network with spam at an artificially low cost. This type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack would degrade network performance and increase costs for everyone.

Towards a Fairer Fee Model on Layer 2

The study underscores the urgent need to redesign the fee models in Ethereum Layer-2 rollups to more accurately reflect the true cost of each transaction. Although these solutions are vital for Ethereum’s future, their sustainability depends on implementing more sophisticated and equitable mechanisms. The next step for developers will be to create dynamic fee structures that protect small users and strengthen the overall security of the ecosystem, ensuring that scalability is not achieved at the expense of fairness and network robustness.

The post A Study Reveals Critical Flaws in the Transaction Costs of Ethereum Layer-2 rollups appeared first on The Cryptocurrency Post.